Re: Terminology discussion

[Victor Reijs <victor.reijs@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Freek,

Freek Dijkstra wrote:
> Well, and in GLIF it's now (propesedly) called:
> GLIF Open LightPath Exchange (GOLE), lambda and LightPath
>
> Yes, I do think these particular words sucks. It's loosy. (I would 
> obviously prefer my words), but at least it avoids confusion, so I'm 
> fine using these words in this community.

I think any wording is indeed good (as long as it is defined), but what 
is more important is what the term means. I wonder if these terms are 
already mentioned in or equivalent with the ones I looked at;-)

http://www.terena.nl/tech/task-forces/tf-ngn/tf-ngn15/20040930_vr_p2p_connections.pdf

All the best,


Victor

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature