Global Lambda Integrated Facility

Re: please comment on global identifiers proposal

  • Subject: Re: please comment on global identifiers proposal
  • From: Thomas Tam <thomas.tam@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 06:49:21 -0400

Hi Ronald,

I have a few comments in section 4:
1: Should the name "sourcing organization" be "sourcing organization/GOLE"? eg. STARLIGHT is a name of the change point. 2: I like the ":" separator between first and second parts. It's really doing its work as separator. 3: In the bullet four, it sounds like we are setting a rule for the sourcing organization/GOLE of how to setup their internal naming. I believe our idea is using whatever the sourcing organization has internally.


Ronald van der Pol wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 19:04:10 -0400, Tom Lehman wrote:


I do think we need to be more precise in Section 4 regarding the format of
the Global ID.
So editing slightly what you presented below, how about this:


I have put this in the document. I have changed the requirements a
little bit. The requirement says "a well-defined set" now instead of
already choosing a particular set. Section 3.3 is now saying
"sourcing organisation" instead of "sourcing GOLE". I have rewritten
section 4.

Please let me know what you think about this version.

Should I remove Lars from the author list? I have not see any
comments by him, so I do not know if he agrees with this content.